Submit Articles Have a story, a point of view, or just an epiphany about our environment? Send your essays to Donna Henry at donna.henry@dc.gov. No story or idea about preserving our planet earth should go untold. Please keep it under 500 words. Green forward!
|

by Christophe A. G. Tulou | How many people does it take to screw in a high-efficiency LED light bulb? How many to plant and maintain a vegetated green roof? Install solar panels on a rooftop? Weatherize a house? Install a rain garden?
Since all these activities are happening now in the District of Columbia, wouldn’t it be good to know? Especially since they represent a new wave of job-creating, environmentally-friendly activities called a “green economy”?

According to a Brookings Institution’s report, Sizing the Clean Economy, the Washington, DC metropolitan area ranks fourth among 100 of the largest metropolitan areas in the US in the growing green economy, which totaled 70,828 clean jobs in 2010. The District had (employed 22,462 people in clean jobs) 22,462 clean jobs in 2010 (with a 1.5% annual growth rate from 2003 to 2010).
As part of Mayor Vincent C. Gray’s Sustainable DC initiative, growing the green economy and the jobs it creates is front-and-center. The Mayor has made clear he plans to establish the District as the nation’s healthiest, greenest and most livable city. DDOE and other agencies are already working hard to make this a reality. Last year, DDOE established—pursuant to DC Council’s forward-focused Clean and Affordable Energy Act—the DC Sustainable Energy Utility (DC SEU), one of the first of its kind in the country. The DC SEU is a private contractor that develops, coordinates, and provides programs that promote the sustainable use of energy in the District. Its job is simple enough: reduce per capita energy consumption by one percent per year; reduce the peak demand for energy; reduce energy consumption by the District’s highest energy users; encourage robust adoption of renewable energy; focus particularly on low-income communities, and create green jobs. Green jobs include the jobs of people who audit energy use in buildings, put in weather stripping, add the insulation, replace drafty windows, install high-efficiency furnaces and air conditioners, install solar units, and . . .yes. . . replace inefficient light bulbs.
In five short months in 2011, the DC SEU created employment for 357 District residents as temporary field staff, permanent office staff, and project-specific implementation contractors. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. The DC SEU is obliged to increase those jobs each year as it invests more in the District’s energy reliability, security, innovation, and efficiency. Additionally, almost 75% of the funds paid to green jobs contractors went to the District’s Certified Business Enterprise (CBE) contractors.
Through Mayor Gray’s Sustainable DC initiative—which has engaged over a thousand citizens to help define our sustainable future—many ideas are surfacing that could substantially build on our solid fourth-place green economy foundation. Among suggestions under active consideration are: urban farms on vacant spaces and rooftops; significant improvements in building energy efficiencies; more renewable energy installations; a smart electric grid; millions of additional square feet of green roofs; green streets and alleys; LED street lighting throughout the city; many more electric vehicle charging stations, streetcars, more bike lanes; recycling and composting facilities; and the list goes on.
All these steps move us toward that healthy, green and livable city the Mayor envisions, and all create jobs. Many are highly accessible jobs—such as planting and nurturing the over one million square feet, or nearly 30 acres, of green rooftops already in place—and others require more specialized capabilities, like weatherization and renewable energy installations, which our universities and community college, and community-based organizations are poised to teach. Come to think of it, we are not just talking green jobs; we are plotting green careers.
Just imagine what we can create with our collective imaginations, creativity, and hard work.
Christophe A. G. Tulou is the Director of District Department of the Environment.

by Robert D. Hormats | Leaders from around the globe will gather this upcoming June in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil for the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development or Rio+20. The conference provides a venue for governments and stakeholders to consider cross-cutting global environment, development, and economic needs. Indeed, there is much to be discussed. The population of the world is seven billion, of which almost one-seventh go hungry every day, one-fourth do not have access to electricity, and one-fifth live in areas where water is scarce. In addition, approximately one-third of the world’s biodiversity has been lost since 1970, three-fourths of the world’s marine fisheries are fully or over exploited, and two-fifths of the planet’s original forests are gone.

Rio+20 marks a new foundation for engaging the global community to build greener and more inclusive economies, smarter cities, and to strengthen institutions and networks to address current and future challenges. The Obama Administration has set a strong foundation and trajectory for enhancing sustainability and building a green economy at home and abroad. Our Global Development Policy recognizes that sustainable development offers a promise of long-term, inclusive, and enduring growth that builds on accountability, effectiveness, efficiency, coordination, and innovation. The United States’ approach to Rio+20 is focused on three key areas:
1. The Built Environment: Clean Energy and Urbanization – Energy is vital for the function of businesses, factories, farms, and schools. Energy security challenges are therefore directly linked to advancing economic development in many countries, especially to reach the 1.3 billion people who do not have access to electricity. We are using development resources to create markets that attract private sector energy-related investments to underserved populations. On the demand side, we are connecting the conservation of natural resources to profitability, thereby protecting the environment and freeing business resources for other types of job creating activities. Urban centers, in particular, offer the opportunity to capture these types of cross-cutting efficiencies.
2. The Natural Environment: Ecosystems Management and Rural Development – Nearly one billion people worldwide suffer from chronic hunger. To increase food yields and nutrition with fewer inputs and smaller impacts on the environment, we need both innovative agricultural technologies and improved understanding of agricultural systems—as well as integrated resource management of our terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems. We are extending support for sustainable, agriculture-led growth that will help lift people out of poverty through the U.S. global hunger and food security initiative, Feed the Future.
3. The Institutional Environment: Modernizing Global Cooperation – The Internet, social media, and other connection technologies allow us to transcend the walls of traditional institutions, fostering truly global collaboration. By embracing twenty-first century connectivity, we can deploy the collective ingenuity and capability of governments, citizens, businesses, and civil society stakeholders from around the world to promote economic development and sustainable environmental practices. In addition, we can enhance national governance capacity in an inclusive manner by improving transparency, public participation in decision making, accountability, and institutional arrangements for effective implementation and enforcement.
The Rio+20 conference offers a chance to come together and consider the needs of our people and planet. How we deal with this moment—whether we succumb to a zero-sum competition over increasingly limited resources or cooperate with each other to build green economies—will determine in large part the security and prosperity of America and the world in the twenty-first century. Mobilizing our greatest asset, the collective capacity and strength of our citizens is vital to our success.
Robert D. Hormats is Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment.

by Paul T. Anastas, Ph.D | Administrator Lisa P. Jackson has said time and again that science is the backbone of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The agency depends upon its scientists and engineers, together with an extensive network of their research colleagues — supported through agency partnerships, grants, awards, and fellowships — to provide the high caliber research, analysis and assessments needed to protect human health and the environment.

For 40 years, EPA has been a world leader in scientific research in human health and environmental protection. Agency science has played a critical role in landmark environmental achievements that have made a real difference, particularly for those living in urban communities such as Washington DC. EPA science led to actions to greatly reduce exposures to secondhand tobacco smoke, remove lead from gasoline, reduce air pollution, and lower the risk from exposures to toxins in the environment. The cumulative benefits have reduced contamination, decreased pollution, restored ecosystems, improved public health, and increased overall life expectancy for all Americans.
Building on that legacy, EPA science is now poised to advance human health and environmental protection on a path toward sustainability. Agency research leaders have been working together and engaging stakeholders to build an overall research portfolio that will leverage EPA’s science efforts to meet the information needs of the EPA and its partners, while simultaneously advancing environmental solutions for a sustainable future.
EPA scientists are erasing the boundaries between scientific disciplines to create a set of integrated, trans-disciplinary research programs: air, climate and energy; safe and sustainable water resources; sustainable and healthy communities; chemical safety for sustainability; human health risk assessment; and homeland security research.
The realigned research plan aims to approach environmental challenges with a holistic, systems perspective. It will allow the agency to continue providing the high caliber science and engineering solutions needed to meet local and national environmental challenges in a cost-effective manner. In an era of challenging budgets, EPA’s new integrated research approach toward sustainability will bring cutting-edge science results to bear faster and more efficiently.
The end result of EPA’s science efforts will be to continue to build on the agency’s legacy of achievement, while helping communities across the United States protect their environment and move forward on a path toward a sustainable future.
Paul T. Anastas is the Assistant Administrator for the U.S. EPA’s Office of Research and Development. To learn more about EPA’s science and technology efforts please visitwww.epa.gov/research.

by Mark Muro | For all the debate, speculation, and controversy that have surrounded the hoped-for growth of the so-called “clean” economy and “green jobs” one thing has been in pretty short supply: facts.
For all the talk of its alluring promise, the clean or green economy remains an enigma in large part due to the continued absence of standard national definitions and data.

That changed with a recent report assessing the current nature, size, and growth of the “green” or “clean” economy in U.S. regions. Developed by the Brookings Metropolitan Policy Program in partnership with Battelle’s Technology Partnership Practice, our report and its underlying database titled, “Sizing the Clean Economy,” are not perfect accountings. Still, they offer a compelling new national and metropolitan look at a sector of the economy that has remained at once an important aspiration and a frustrating enigma. Look over the report, watch the video of the discussion, and check out the special interactive mapping tool developed — all aimed at shedding further light on the geography of this hard-to-assess sector.
Over the past year, we’ve developed and analyzed a detailed database of establishment-level employment statistics pertaining to a sensibly defined assemblage of low-carbon and environmentally oriented industries in the United States and its metropolitan areas.
Covering the years 2003 to 2010 for larger U.S. metropolitan areas, the resulting information provides a new source of timely information that is both consistently applied so as to allow cross-region comparisons but detailed enough to be of some use to inform national, state, and regional leaders on the dynamics of the U.S. low-carbon and environmental goods and services super-sector as they are transpiring in U.S. regions.
To be sure, localized drill-downs in particular places may capture a fuller profile in some regions. But overall, our new information provides what we believe is a plausible, useful, first-of-its-kind measure of the size and growth of the clean economy as it is occurring in the nation’s 100 largest metropolitan areas.
It’s time that all U.S. regions begin to have access to some at least rough order-of-magnitude facts about the size and shape of their clean economies.
Mark Muro is Senior Fellow and Policy Director of Metropolitan Policy Program at the Brookings Institute.

by Howard Ways, AICP | Much of the recent national discourse around the green economy centers on the success or failure of individual companies like Solydra. While there are several factors that contribute to the profitability of a business, local economies are an intricate, complex web of market sector forces and public sector policies. With less national fanfare, cities like the District of Columbia have made tremendous strides in transforming local economies into more green economies.

Unlike the industrial or information economies before, the green economy is, at its core, a restorative economy. The near consensus in the scientific community is that the earth’s weather patterns and temperature have changed over the last 50 years and much of the evidence points to human settlement patterns as a root cause of these changes. A green economy can help slow the pace of environmental change, reverse the harmful trends of the last half century, improve complex ecosystems, and restore natural habitat.
Many metrics are used to measure the impact of the green economy – for example, the percentage of municipal waste that gets recycled or composted, the number of green buildings constructed, the percentage of people who commute to work by walking, biking or public transit. However, it is green jobs that often emerge as the top measurable output of the green economy.
If ten people are asked what a green job is, they may provide ten different responses. However, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) defines green jobs as either:
Jobs in businesses that produce goods or provide services that benefit the environment or conserve natural resources or
Jobs in which workers’ duties involve making their establishment’s production processes more environmentally friendly or use fewer natural resources.
Many studies, including the District’s 2009 Green Collar Job Demand Analysis and the U.S. Conference of Mayors 2006 Metro Green Jobs Report, estimate the number of green jobs in the District to be between 22,000 and 25,000, or about 4% of all jobs in the city. The composition of these jobs reflects trends within the larger labor pool, with many of the District’s green jobs in construction, real estate, engineering, design, and law. A higher percentage of green jobs in the District require a bachelor’s degree than in most cities.
As green business practices become more commonplace, the studies project nearly 200,000 green jobs being created over 25 years. The District, with its educated workforce and progressive public policies, is poised to remain a leader in the green economy.
Howard Ways is the Director of Planning and Sustainability at the University of the District of Columbia.

by Rebecca Stack | With the RiverSmart brand the District has received great praise and recognition from residents and officials. It is first and foremost the helpful, giving face, of local government. The programs educate, empower, and financially assist, property owners to become better environmental stewards. What we don’t often herald, is the entry level introduction many of our residents are receiving as they participate as workers in these incentive programs. They are helping to create the District’s green economy.

Installing a rain barrel, planting a tree, or weeding a rain garden, these jobs require modest training, and build competitive working skills. While discussions on the value of the emerging green economy is often focused on the energy sector and the high skill, high paying areas that require equally high levels of education, these DDOE initiatives offer District workers access and stepping stones into the world of work itself. We expect as the RiverSmart brand expands it will continue to stimulate the market for innovative on-site stormwater management technologies and in turn continue to expand the job market for those who provide, install, and maintain these technologies.
Incentive programs are but one of the many drivers for green jobs in the District. More controversial may be the role of environmental regulations. There are those that contend regulations stifle the economy but the 2011 United Nations Environmental Program “Green Economy Report” makes a clear case, on the world stage, for the essential role of governments to transition from grey to green, and highlights not only the compatibility, but the necessity, between this transition and continued economic growth. Tiny increases in investment foster this shift and will support emerging green jobs sectors such as urban food production, green buildings, tree canopy growth and maintenance, eco-tourism, and small distributed water and waste management approaches.
As DDOE responds to Federal demands to provide even greater protection to our natural resources, economic analysis of the increasingly protective regulations suggests there will be a similarly small increase in investment required, by some measures, less than one tenth of one percent. As requirements for the inclusion of green infrastructure on public and private development grow, the expansion of the job market for those who provide, install, and maintain these technologies will follow.
The District has many green assets. How those that live and work here grow and manage those assets will determine the ecological, economic and cultural returns. In this capital city our green infrastructure can provide the underlying foundation for the growth of a healthy community with many employment opportunities across many spheres of work.
Rebecca Stack is a Low Impact Development (LID) Specialist in the Watershed Protection Division at DDOE.

by Polina Bakhteiarov | These days, almost anywhere you go, the green economy is a hot topic. But at many American universities, few courses focus on the “triple bottom line” of sustainability to comprehensively examine the interrelationships between the environment, economy, and community equity. Furthermore, there is a lack of practical training on sustainability issues, and sustainability is often segregated into an isolated academic pursuit in place of full integration into students’ lives.

The green economy is not just about making businesses green; it also provides a framework for reducing disparities within and across our communities. And while many college classes focus on two of the three aspects of the triple bottom line – environment and economy – the third aspect, equity, is often overlooked: there is limited opportunity in the mainstream curriculum to explore historic inequality in housing, education, healthcare, and the job market. Without tackling issues of equity, we miss a critical opportunity to educate students on the potential of sustainable approaches not only to “green” our society and create jobs, but also to improve communities and foster equality. As a result, college graduates emerge unprepared to fully embrace all that sustainability has to offer, including the potential to improve quality of life while growing labor force participation and developing local, regional, and national economies.
So how do we turn the tide and begin to prepare young people to embrace the full range of potential benefits in the green economy? First, we address college curricula and ensure that broad sustainability concepts, including economy, environment, and equity, are incorporated into core classes and institutionalized across disciplines such as management, engineering, and public policy. Second, we instill green habits in students’ daily routines using a diverse and innovative toolkit of sustainability practices, including:
- Competitions among or within university campuses to reduce energy and water use
- Accessible and enjoyable walking and biking routes (with sufficient bike parking) throughout the campus to discourage automobile use
- Campus-wide recycling and composting training, infrastructure, and enforcement
- On-campus food production (using campus compost as fertilizer) and farmers markets
Third, we invest in practical learning. Students with an interest in sustainability should have opportunities to participate in hands-on instruction in areas such as weatherization, recycling and waste management, and other experiential learning. Thus, through practical experience, a focus on education and behavior change, and inter-disciplinary curriculum development, the next generation will be well prepared to live, work, and succeed in the new green economy.
Polina Bakhteiarov is a Capital City Fellow in DDOE’s Office of Policy and Sustainability. She is a recent graduate of the Master in City Planning program at MIT, where she concentrated in community and economic development.

by Mayor Vincent C. Gray | Washington, DC is an established leader in sustainability. We are first in green power consumption, ranked third in the number of LEED certified buildings, and have the largest bike-share program in the country. According to a 2010 study conducted by the Economist Intelligence Unit, DC is ranked #8 amongst 27 of the greenest metropolitan cities in North America, and has been voted #1 in environmental governance.
While our accomplishments to date have been impressive, I believe we can do even more to make the nation’s capital a more sustainable and forward-thinking city.

In July 2011, I announced that I would work with the people of this great city to make the District the most sustainable city in the United States. This is a huge undertaking. But, I am confident that we are capable of achieving this goal. We are fortunate to have, one of the most energetic, grassroots communities of environmental advocates right here in the District. These individuals and organizations have demonstrated the willingness to do what’s necessary to help the District succeed in this endeavor. Their advocacy and support will allow us to meet our end goal, which is to connect sustainability with economic development and become the most sustainable city in North America.”
Earlier this summer, I launched “Sustainable DC,” a planning process designed to make the District the greenest, healthiest, and most vibrant city it can be. I’ve directed my team to solicit feedback from a variety of stakeholders, the most important of which are DC’s residents, who will serve as the architects of what a sustainable DC should look and feel like. Their ideas and recommendations will help to inform our planning process, our policies and our programs. Sustainable DC kicked off with a launch campaign called, “Start in September.” This intensive public outreach campaign resulted in staff from the DDOE as well as the Office of Planning attending more than 25 public meetings and events in September alone. We are continuing to gather ideas from residents across the city through our website,www.sustainable.dc.gov. To date, hundreds of visitors have contributed innovative ideas on how to make the District more sustainable.
This month, working groups comprised of subject matter experts, District government staff, and the public will begin researching and analyzing key topics: the built environment, climate, energy, food, the green economy, nature, transportation, water, and waste. In addition to identifying bold new ideas, Sustainable DC will incorporate current plans, projects, and initiatives into a clear vision of sustainability for the District. Using that information, we will develop ambitious, but achievable, goals and initiatives for achieving our collective vision of a truly “Sustainable DC.”
Visit our website, www.sustainable.dc.gov , and tell us what you are doing to ensure that your country or city becomes sustainable. Alternatively, we can be reached at sustainable.future@dc.gov. As you know, the environment is the thread that connects us all.
Vincent C. Gray, Mayor

by Jessica Daniels | Is the District’s air safe to breathe? For the residents in the Washington metro area who suffer from heart and respiratory ailments, not always. The lungs act as filters. When dirty air is inhaled, and there are impurities than cannot be expelled by normal bodily processes, damage can occur, especially for sensitive populations such as children and the elderly. On bad air days, there are increases in hospitalizations and emergency room visits. Symptoms of exposure to bad air range from coughing, difficulty breathing, and inflammation and irritation of the respiratory tract, to the development of lung or heart disease and premature mortality.
Last year marked the 40th anniversary of the Clean Air Act, one of the first environmental laws designed to minimize threats to public health and welfare. To comply, EPA sets air emissions standards for the six most common “criteria” pollutants: ozone (O3), particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and lead (Pb). Since local air quality improvement programs began, concentrations of these pollutants have dropped in the District and surrounding areas.
Even so, the American Lung Association’s 2011 “State of the Air” report listed the Washington region as the 14th most polluted metropolitan area for ground-level ozone. The District currently complies with all of EPA’s air quality standards except for ground-level ozone, or smog. Pollutant levels in the District compared with the Clean Air Act standards are presented below. (Pb levels are not included in the chart because they are especially low.)

Ozone is a colorless, odorless gas that exists naturally in the Earth’s upper atmosphere, where it shields the Earth from the sun’s ultraviolet rays, but it is also found close to the Earth’s surface where we live and breathe. “Ozone season” in the Washington, DC, region, when photochemical reactions that form ozone are most likely to occur, is between May and September.
In the District, air pollutants are primarily emitted by motor vehicles. Other sources include large and small boilers and generators that burn fuel to service buildings, construction and lawn maintenance equipment, the use of paints and adhesives and other commercial and consumer products, as well as fumes from gasoline stations, dry cleaners, printing stores, restaurants, and the like.

Air pollution is also “transported” into the area from the operation of power plants and industrial and manufacturing facilities in upwind states. For example, earlier this year, Mayor Gray expressed concern about the transport of pollution from a facility in Virginia into Ward 8, where asthma rates are amongst the highest in the nation. Shortly afterwards, decades-long pressures to close the Potomac River Generating Station, a coal-fired power plant located in Alexandria, were concluded. Plant operations will likely cease in 2012.
DDOE’s Air Quality Division monitors the ambient air quality at several locations in the District. That information is compared to air quality standards to develop long-term air quality improvement strategies. Vehicle emissions inspections and maintenance program and air pollution emission limits on stationary sources through permitting are examples of control measures the District has put in place in the recent years.
Will the air quality continue to improve in the coming years? Very likely. As EPA continues to tighten the standards for common pollutants, cooperation amongst states and regions to develop innovative solutions will become increasingly critical.
Jessica Daniels is an Environmental Protection Specialist in the Air Quality Division at the District Department of the Environment.

by Cecily Beall | Did you know that is it illegal to idle a commercial vehicle in the District for more than three minutes? In fact, the District has an aggressive idling enforcement and outreach program. All fossil fuel-powered vehicles emit air pollutants, although diesel vehicles are a particular problem. Tailpipe emissions contribute to a wide variety of respiratory and heart problems, including asthma. Washington DC has one of the highest rates of childhood asthma in the country. One of the most common calls we receive from the public is about an idling vehicle in front of their home or office.

So what are we doing about the problem of engine idling in the District? Of course, we have a traditional enforcement program. DC is known to have one of the most active idling enforcement programs in the region. However, given the large number of vehicles, inspectors cannot check them all. Therefore, we are taking some innovative outreach approaches to educate truck and bus drivers in the Metropolitan Washington region about the District’s idling regulation.
DC’s regulation limits idling of commercial vehicles to three minutes, unless it is below freezing, in which case the limit is five minutes. The fine for a violation is $1,000, which we hope is a significant deterrent. And the fine doubles each time the same company receives another ticket. Inspectors check for idling vehicles in areas such as the monuments and museums on the national Mall, Ford’s Theater, the farmer’s market, and trash transfer stations. You probably think of delivery trucks and tour buses when you think of idling, but we have also issued fines to armored trucks, school buses, and trucks that shred paper files. There are three District and two Federal agencies with the authority to issue tickets for violating the idling limits. While we enforce the idling regulation year round, we step up enforcement during the summer, when vehicle emissions contribute to the ozone (smog) problem.
In an effort that is part of both enforcement and outreach, DDOE is using federal stimulus funds to make and place approximately 800 anti-idling signs in areas around the District where inspectors regularly see idling buses and trucks. In addition to tourist and business areas, we are working with the Office of the State Superintendent of Education to place signs near schools where buses and parent vehicles idle and at school loading docks where delivery trucks idle. If after all this effort we have extra no-idling signs, we hope to be able to offer them to businesses in the District that have idling vehicles such as delivery trucks.
Air pollution in the District is a regional problem because air pollutants come from many sources outside the District. In addition, many of the vehicles operating and idling in the District come from outside the District. For these reasons, we have been working with our counterparts in Virginia and Maryland and regional and national trucking and busing associations on an outreach campaign to truck and bus drivers. Our efforts have included articles, advertisements, and editorials in online and paper magazines directed at drivers. We also placed announcements about idling regulations and fines on satellite radio programs specifically targeted to truck drivers. We posted banners and signs in the bus parking lots at Six Flags America in Maryland. Our inspectors identified the most common areas in the District for idling trucks and buses, and street teams went to those areas to hand out brochures about idling and talk with drivers about the health impacts of idling. And finally, we began a Driver Recognition Program, giving recognition and prizes to bus and truck drivers who were observed turning their engines off promptly. For more information about the campaign or to nominate a driver, go to www.TurnYourEngineOff.org
By using traditional enforcement and innovative outreach and education efforts, multiple sources of funding, coordination with neighboring jurisdictions, and cooperation with interested partners, DDOE is working to reduce one of the sources of air pollution in the District and so improve the health of those who live, work, and play here.
Cecily Beall is the Associate Director of Air Quality Division at DDOE.
|
|